

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon Reliability & Philosophy |
| From: | Alistair Bell |
| Date: | Mon, 1 Jul 2019 12:53:42 -0700 |
What failed on the alternator Jim? Alistair > On Jul 1, 2019, at 12:41 PM, Jim. Felder <jim.felder@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > One thing Pirsig never factored in was the spiraling disaster that is rebuilt assemblies. Tomorrow I will pay $140 for a rebuilt alternator for my diesel Vanagon. The problem is that I paid one of the list vendors that much for the item originally—exactly 11,678 miles ago, a Bosch Premium Rebuild. When you are on the wrong end of the life cycle curve on starters and alternators, preventive maintenance becomes catch-and-release. As soon as you install the thing, start looking for the next one. > > > > Jim > > > > > > > >> >> On Jul 1, 2019 at 10:37 AM, <Jack Elliott (mailto:pdaxe2gto@gmail.com)> wrote: >> >> >> >> I just see my van as entropy in action. Also an engineer (though >> electrical, not mechanical) I view it as a system of parts that are >> imperfect, a kludge of things that will work for a while. It's gonna break. >> In a big way, or a small way, the oncoming heat death of the universe makes >> itself known. I stay alert for signs of weirdness and try to understand >> them, see if they are significant or not, and address them accordingly to >> the best of these guesses and the best of my ability. I rely on the >> knowledge of others whenever I can. Adding a passenger, a SO for example, >> who does not share my willingness to accept the inevitable, will greatly >> reduce the sometimes pleasurable aspect of dealing with a breakdown and >> solving the problem creatively. IOW, if getting someplace on time is >> critical, if there are others with me that will not get a kick out of being >> stuck somewhere because an oil filter blew off (it happened to me due to my >> ignorance of filter threads, another story), then it's gonna have a Bad >> Time. Masochism in action? To paraphrase my son, "any d*****bag with a >> credit card can have a reliable car." Sometimes just getting somewhere >> without trouble is in itself accomplishment enough. >> >> That, plus people think these vehicles are totally cool and wish they could >> get one. >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 8:02 AM kenneth wilford (Van-Again) < >> kenwilfy@comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> I look at the van as a never ending restoration project. You start with >>> the things that affect your safety and reliability first like brakes, >>> steering, suspension, the engine, the transmission. Once these have been >>> inspected and repaired, then you can move on to creature comforts like AC >>> and cosmetics. The problem is most folks focus on the creature comforts >>> and cosmetics first and expect the mechanicals will be fine as long as the >>> van looks good (new paint or wheels), and has a great sounding radio (I >>> guess it is fun to rock out while you wait for the tow truck). >>> >>> Also one of my customers chants this mantra, "Don't let perfection get in >>> the way of good enough." You have to know when to say when on any >>> project. If you are seeking perfection you will never find it. But if you >>> are seeking functionality and safety you should find it in enough measure >>> to feel confident in your Vanagon. I use Progressive insurance which >>> includes a nice towing and roadside assistance plan, which I think every >>> car owner should have no matter what they are driving. >>> >>> That is about it. I know the aircraft mechanic, engineer, etc. tends to >>> over analyze and over think the repairs or restoration of the van. Usually >>> this leads to lots of great plans, ripping everything apart to do a >>> "proper" restoration, and then abandoning the project when life gets in the >>> way. Avoid this. Instead, do the basics, get it running and safe, and >>> then enjoy it for the summer or two before doing the "full monty" on it. >>> That way you can decide if you really want to do that, or if you want to >>> sell it to someone else, or if you are "gasp" satisfied with the van even >>> with the quirks and imperfections. Some of them came from the factory... >>> >>> Ken >>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 10:28 AM Alex MeVay <alex@mevay.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> I've also been interested in exploring this, and I think Richard S >>>> gave some great points. >>>> >>>> I'm 5 years into my Vanagon, and it's given me the highest highs and >>>> lowest lows of any vehicle I've owned. Some of the recent trip >>>> reports have done a good job capturing the highs. As for the lows: >>>> after endless weekends and evenings of work, sitting there staring at >>>> a half-busted van and a to-do list that never gets any shorter... Rod >>>> sticking through the oil pan (I-4) one day before your long-planned >>>> trip down the CA coast with your SO... You know the routine. >>>> >>>> At first, I approached the van like I would my other projects: as an >>>> engineer (my day job). I would think through each repair and upgrade >>>> to make sure it would last at least 1,000 years (or say at least 30), >>>> and add to the todo list anything that might ever fail ever. This was >>>> a recipe for negative thoughts and feelings about the van. I >>>> struggled, even to the point of having impure thoughts about >>>> Sprinters. At some point, I stumbled across this article, which I >>>> found extremely helpful: >>>> >>>> https://worldpowersystems.com/PROJECTS/wabiTekSabi/index.html >>>> >>>> Among other points, it encourages thinking about objects as processes >>>> or situations, not perfected Platonic ideals. Instead of thinking >>>> about the van as an object I have thus far failed to perfect, it's >>>> better to think about the process and context: the exchange of driving >>>> the van, doing maintenance. A van by itself is meaningless...add a >>>> driver, a 2-lane road, and that exchange of energy, and now you're >>>> going somewhere. Instead of asking myself, "Is it perfect?", I >>>> learned to ask, "Will it get me to the desert and back in relative >>>> safety and comfort?" This is a much lower standard, but it gets more >>>> to the heart of why I think we all do this. It acknowledges that, >>>> even before you tighten that last bolt, the process of decay and >>>> failure has started. All is flux, but that's OK. >>>> >>>> >>>> Turning to more concrete matters, I think what Richard said about your >>>> eyes and seat being the OBD hits the nail on the head. Being >>>> mercilessly vigilant about understanding every creak, drip, vibration, >>>> and smell is the best way to avoid big problems. You don't need to >>>> fix it all, but I feel you need to understand it. For every issue or >>>> warning sign, I ask: >>>> >>>> What is the root cause? >>>> >>>> How bad is this if it fails? (annoyance, or end of trip?) >>>> >>>> Is it likely to fail all at once, or slowly get worse? (Will I have >>>> some warning that a repair is required?) >>>> >>>> Is there a possibility of cascading failure? (i.e., bad engine >>>> mount->trashed exhaust) >>>> >>>> Can it be repaired in the field? >>>> >>>> Running through these questions for each issue helps me prioritize >>>> repairs and understand the risks I am taking (or lack thereof) each >>>> time I head out on a trip. >>>> >>>> What other philosophies or mind-tricks have helped you enjoy Vanagon >>>> ownership, or simply get out and back safely? >>>> >>>> Alex >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 10:32 PM Richard Smith <smirby@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On reliability: >>>>> >>>>> I commend everyone who works on reliability, and I think it is >>> something >>>> we should all be mindful of. Without the "RE" you have a liability. __ >>>>> >>>>> On the "my wife/husband hates my van because it is unreliable" theme, I >>>> like to approach that problem from three directions: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Manage expectations. I start every (longer) trip with a reminder >>> that >>>> we could get towed, and that it shouldn't be seen as a disaster. This may >>>> appease the karma gods - I haven't been towed yet - but it also sets the >>>> tone for whatever calamity arises. >>>>> >>>>> 2. Live in the moment. If our cars didn't falter from time to time, and >>>> we drifted along in uncaring bliss, would get get to meet those >>> exceptional >>>> people who rise to the occasion? Every breakdown that I have had has been >>>> just as interesting as the rest of the trip. >>>>> >>>>> 3. Invest in your ride. Do the things that need doing, when they need >>>> it. Replace the fuel lines. Make sure the brakes, tires, suspension are >>> all >>>> in good condition before you set out. This won't make it never break >>> down, >>>> but it will remove some of the failure points. We don't have a lot of >>>> sensors telling us what is wrong, so your ears (and seat) are your "OBD" >>>> system. >>>>> >>>>> We often mistake the reliability that we see in others' vehicles for a >>>> completely trouble-free experience. They, too, have had their share of >>>> breakdowns, its just that we don't see them. In my time owning Vanagons >>>> (and a '73 bus before that), it has been no worse than lots of other >>> cars, >>>> and better than many. >>>>> >>>>> For most of us, our vanagon is >30 years old. This carries with it a >>>> weighty responsibility in maintenance but also the need to embrace the >>>> uncertainty that it brings with it. >>>>> >>>>> Despite all this, it remains a joy to own, and if that comes with a >>>> frisson of excitement because of the chance of breakdown, I'll take it. >>> Not >>>> for everyone, to be sure, but that's how I am dealing with it. >>>>> >>>>> ...r >>>>> >>>>> On 2019-06-30, 5:37 PM, "Vanagon Mailing List on behalf of Richard >>>> Koerner" <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com on behalf of rjkinpb@SBCGLOBAL.NET> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Which brings me to a last point. A few months ago someone >>> mentioned >>>> reliability as their main goal with their Westy. I am very interested in >>>> ideas about reliability that anyone might share. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Ken Wilford >>> John 3:16 >>> www.vanagain.com >>> >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »