

| Subject: | Re: Aluminum coolant tanks. Why? |
| From: | Eric Caron |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Jul 2021 13:39:30 -0400 |
Hi Mark, In a earlier post Dennis mentioned that the GW tank has a visual way of seeing coolant level, not available in the VC version. I think that is why he started using them. Eric > On Jul 24, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Mark McCulley <markmcculley@GMAIL.COM> wrote: > > Interesting discussion. Dennis, thanks for the info on why an aluminum tank > isn't just another piece of bling (albeit hidden in the engine compartment). > > Is there any appreciable difference between the tank offered by vancafe and > the gowesty one? The vancafe tank is a bit more expensive. The gowesty tank > is on backorder now. > > Regards, > Mark > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 3:15 PM Dennis Haynes <d23haynes57@hotmail.com> > wrote: > >> The aluminum coolant tanks were developed in response to the high failure >> rate of the original tank. These failures were a result of the design and >> materials used. The cap itself is also a high failure item. The problem is >> worse now as the tanks available are of even poorer material. Adding to >> this tank failure can also caused by other system issues such as combustion >> gasses getting into the system or other failures including fan not >> functioning. In these events undiagnosed failures often result in ear >> immediate failure of the tank or cap. The metal based tanks are much more >> tolerant and so is the pressure cap. In addition the standard design cap >> used with these tanks besides being robust and tolerant are easily >> inspected and replaced. They also can release pressure and suck back more >> reliably, with more capacity and not get damaged by a steam blast. The >> standardized cap design also allows for easier attachment of pressure >> testers and even pressurized filling equipment. >> >> The real consideration is reliability and saving an engine. For all the >> bad press the Waterboxer gets the reality is that while there are some >> weaknesses they really never wear out and most all failures are the result >> of some fluid system failure, coolant, oil, or fuel. While you may need to >> deal with outer head gaskets, a burned valve, or maybe even rings, if you >> never loose the coolant, oil pressure or lean-flood the cylinders Upgrading >> this tank with fuel you will never loose one of these engines. Upgrading >> this tank eliminates one more engine killer. I do acknowledge that these >> tanks are not perfect. The hose nipples don't quit fit the hose and clamp >> design, on one the coolant sensor is satisfied as long coolant is still >> spraying on it, and I don’t think they separate the dirt and debris out >> like the original. But getting the better cap and eliminating the sudden >> failure failures is worth the cost. >> >> Dennis >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com> On Behalf Of gary >> hradek >> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 11:18 AM >> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM >> Subject: Aluminum coolant tanks >> >> If the plastic ones are still available why would anyone want the weight >> of an Aluminum coolant tanks at nearly 10x the cost? >>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »