

| Subject: | Re: 1991 Vanagon 2.1L auto: failed DE emission test: CO (high) |
| From: | OlRivrRat |
| Date: | Wed, 31 May 2023 22:56:34 -0600 |
Karl
Here’s My .5cent >
General Rules of Emission Analysis
• If CO goes up, O2 goes down, and conversely if O2 goes up, CO goes down.
Remember, CO readings are an indicator of a rich running engine
and O2 readings are an indicator of a lean running engine.
• If HC increases as a result of a lean misfire, O2 will also increase
• CO2 will decrease in any of the above cases because of an air/fuel imbalance or misfire
• An increase in CO does not necessarily mean there will be an increase in HC.
Additional HC will only be created at the point where rich misfire begins (3% to 4% CO)
• High HC, low CO, and high O2 at same time indicates a misfire due to lean or EGR diluted mixture
• High HC, high CO, and high O2 at same time indicates a misfire due to excessively rich mixture.
• High HC, Normal to marginally low CO, high O2, indicates a misfire due to a mechanical engine problem
or ignition misfire
• Normal to marginally high HC, Normal to marginally low CO, and high O2 indicates a misfire due to
false air or marginally lean mixture
From here
http://www.crypton.co.za/Tto%20know/Emissions/exhaust%20emissions.html
http://ricksfreeautorepairadvice.com/fix-high-hc-and-failed-emissions-test/
https://www.smogtips.com/failed-high-hydrocarbons-HC.cfm
http://www.auto-repair-help.com/auto_diagnostics/diagnose_emission_test_failure.php
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4st6Hf5-nJ4 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4st6Hf5-nJ4>
> On 31 May , 2023, at 5:38 PM, Karl Ploessl <karl.ploessl@GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
> I was driving about 10 miles to DMV and was waiting in line ~ 30 minutes
> with engine idling.
> -----
>
> Karl '81 Westy "Jenny"
>
> '91 Westy "Jenny 2" Wilmington, DE
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 7:29 PM Eric Caron <ericcaron96@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Wow!
>>
>> This will be an interesting conversation.
>>
>> Only thing I’ve heard of is it helps to get tested when engine is well
>> heated up. Also, basic tune up might help. But, I look forward to better
>> thoughts.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>>> On May 31, 2023, at 5:41 PM, Karl Ploessl <karl.ploessl@GMAIL.COM>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> here are the numbers:
>>>
>>> low high
>>>
>>> HC (ppm)
>>>
>>> readings 145 88
>>>
>>> limit 220 220
>>>
>>> result PASS PASS
>>>
>>>
>>> CO (%)
>>>
>>> readings 3.39 2.48
>>>
>>> limit 1.20 1.20
>>>
>>> result FAIL FAIL
>>>
>>>
>>> CO (%) + CO2 (%)
>>>
>>> readings7.49 13.24
>>>
>>>
>>> RPM reading
>>>
>>> readings 935 2580
>>>
>>> limit 500 2200
>>>
>>> result PASS PASS
>>>
>>>
>>> The alignments of the table is somewhat screwed up but it failed CO
>>> emission at low and at high RPMs (935 and 2580). What would be the
>> reason?
>>>
>>>
>>> Karl '81 Westy "Jenny"
>>>
>>> '91 Westy "Jenny 2" Wilmington, DE
>>
>>Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »