

| Subject: | Re: Google AI Superior For Vanagon Questions |
| From: | Ned Savoie |
| Date: | Thu, 7 Dec 2023 19:02:07 -0500 |
Wow, that's really interesting. Looking forward to it... Ned -- Ned Savoie Creative Director Harbour Light Strategic Marketing Savvy Software, Inc. 3 Congress Street 2nd Floor Left Portsmouth, NH 03801 [Telephone] 603.427.2821 [Facsimile] 603.427.0938 [Mobile] 603.828.2400 On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 6:17 PM Derek Drew <derekdrew@derekmail.com> wrote: > I entered some search queries into ChatGPT 3.5 https://chat.openai.com/ > about sophisticated Vanagon technical matters and most of the answers that > came back were wrong and kind of stupid. > > Then, I entered the same questions into Google's Bard AI Engine at > https://bard.google.com/ and most of the answers were generally correct, > and much more sophisticated from an engineering point of view. > > I have not entered the same questions into ChatGPT 4 though, and > reportedly, ChatGPT 4 Turbo will shortly be available for free via Bing > Chat. ChatGPT 4 Turbo is very interesting because it is possible to custom > train it. I would train it by feeding it all the emails related to Vanagon > from 1994 and also tell it to read all of thesamba.com's Vanagon section. > There are another 30 major Vanagon discussion areas online that I know of > that could feed it data. > > Anyway, for the moment, it looks like bard is king based on me spending 20 > minutes testing both engines. > > > ____________________________ > *Derek Drew* > Sharon CT > derekdrew@derekmail.com > Email is best normally but... > Mobile: 703-408-1532 (voice and texts) >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »