Derek,

I would be interested to know how well Microsoft Bing Chat (in more precise
mode) performs with the same technical questions?

https://www.bing.com/search?q=Bing+AI&showconv=1&FORM=hpcodx

John

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 6:17 PM Derek Drew <derekdrew@derekmail.com> wrote:

> I entered some search queries into ChatGPT 3.5 https://chat.openai.com/
> about sophisticated Vanagon technical matters and most of the answers that
> came back were wrong and kind of stupid.
>
> Then, I entered the same questions into Google's Bard AI Engine at
> https://bard.google.com/ and most of the answers were generally correct,
> and much more sophisticated from an engineering point of view.
>
> I have not entered the same questions into ChatGPT 4 though, and
> reportedly, ChatGPT 4 Turbo will shortly be available for free via Bing
> Chat. ChatGPT 4 Turbo is very interesting because it is possible to custom
> train it. I would train it by feeding it all the emails related to Vanagon
> from 1994 and also tell it to read all of thesamba.com's Vanagon section.
> There are another 30 major Vanagon discussion areas online that I know of
> that could feed it data.
>
> Anyway, for the moment, it looks like bard is king based on me spending 20
> minutes testing both engines.
>
>
> ____________________________
> *Derek Drew*
> Sharon CT
> derekdrew@derekmail.com
> Email is best normally but...
> Mobile: 703-408-1532 (voice and texts)
>