On Sat, 16 Apr 1994 RGOLEN@umassd.edu wrote:

> What I see here is one of two things. The first VWUS is doing a piss-
> poor job of selling their product, or at least informing the buyer
> about the product and how it is different, better than other vans; or
> the second, most of you are taking your positions in this "discussion"
> with little or no factual or actual EV experience. I will assume that
> it is the former not the latter.

Actually, it has to be (by your meticulous data) both.

> As to the "minivan" designation, we all know how RELIABLE Consumer
> Reports is when it comes to VWs. 

Or anything.  I wasn't using that as a strict datapoint, just as a 
demonstration of the impression.

> As Sgt. Friday used to say: "Just the facts...."

The facts are much appreciated! Thanks.
This is all moot to me as I'll never buy a new car, so the Eurovan is
about 10 years off for me.

--
Gerry
Gerald Skerbitz <gsker@lenti.med.umn.edu> U of MN Med.School.Admin 6-5379
1984 VW Vanagon Waterboxer 1915