> I think you could get some argument from people on this list on this.
> The engines were actually very strong and dependable compared to the
> older Type I engine.   
> 
> > 		Not many....that's why I also own one. But, again, I'm not
> > 		so sure I would if there had been some competition internal
> > 		to the US. Our campers aren't perfect. I think they're way
> > 		too noisy inside; the A/C ducting is assinine as they shoulda
> > 		used the ducting that goes to the dash;^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
>                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> You sure got that right.
> 
> 	       no graywater sump.
> > 		But, yes, considering the lack of competition in the near-full-
> > 		service-camper, car-size, pop-top camper market, it's the best
> > 		on the road.
> 
> My sentiment exactly.
> 
> What were we arguing about?  ;)
> 

	Debating, maybe.....

	I was first responding to what I perceived to be intense dislike
	of statements made on what I consider to be a comedy radio show. But,
	I know I'm sensitive to what I perceive to be elitism in folks. Working
	in the computer biz, I've grown weary of the emotional attachments
	folks develop to "things" and that also applies to vehicles. While I
	share Ric's frustration with the effect on the market by those average
	drivers, I guess I'm less interested as I get older to reject others
	values that don't match mine, meaning I don't take alot of this stuff
	as seriously as I used to. Probably part of some old fart syndrome.

	Stuart R.