

| Subject: | Re: '72, dog of a year |
| From: | Eric Oster |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Sep 1994 21:43:21 -0700 (PDT) |
My brother has a `72 westy, and has had no problems in 2-4 years.... but then again, he has a 914 engine innit........ ************************************************************************** * | * *Eric Oster (ekoman@u.washington.edu)| Max. output(DIN)...34bhp.@3600 rpm* * | (SAE, w/air cleaner)...41.5 bhp@ * * `63 kombi | 3900 rpm * * `55 Ford 'vert |Max. torque(DIN)...8.4mkg(61 ft.lbs* * `66 westy(This Wed.:):):)) | @2000 rpm * * `I think this next hill _may_ | (SAE, w/air cleaner) 9.0mkg(65 ft.* * be a problem...' | lbs.) @2400 rpm * ************************************************************************** On Mon, 26 Sep 1994 DerekDrew@aol.com wrote: > I had a 72 westy for 17 years and I always considered it a dog of a year. > > You had the horrible combination of the first year of the type IV motor, but > it was little larger than the beetle motor in the 71 and earlier motors. > while the later busses had those nice 2.0 litre motors. Meanwhile, the type > IV motors cost double the beetle motors that 71 busses had. > > And to kick me in the shins, the engine could only be accessed from the rear > instead of the top like later 70s era busssses. It made it a pain and near > impossible to work on the carbs, which always seemed to need work. > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »