

| Subject: | Re: Originator Names |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Oct 94 11:38:10 EDT |
David Schwarze writes: > > DerekDrew@aol.com writes: > > > > I have begun receiving messages which indicate the original sender as sender > > rather than the vanagon list as sender. I don't know if this is something > > Gerry is doing or if my AOL software has begun doing this. > > I haven't seen anything like that with ELM (Unix mailer) Nor have I with ELM (except for messages that I send which come back multiple recipients. > > > Either way, it isn't such a good idea. When I hit my reply button the message > > might go back to that individual rather than to the whole list. > > I prefer it that way. You can still send a group reply if you want, which > would go back to the list. Having ALL replies sent to the list makes it > very hard to send private mail as a response. > > > About 1/2 of the messages on this list have no business being here as it is > > merely mindless chatter from lonely people. > > Why thank you. What a genuinely nice thing to say! Derek; why don't you define mindless chatter? Some might consider your above points mindless and something that should be directed towards Gerry rather than the group. Stupid is as stupid does... > > > I feel that Joel can post any > > message he likes because he regularly contributes very valuable technical > > information. > > Not to me, I don't have a Vanagon. In principle, I agree with you, though. > > > Some of the other people are just blowing hot air into this > > thing and it has the potential to drive people with real jobs and real lives > > off the list. Derek please define hot air. What makes your points more valuable and worth listening to? > > Now come on Derek, ALL of us have "real jobs and real lives". Yes, that > includes Ric. :) > > > The saving grace is when people properly identify their subject matter. Those > > of us who don't want to read poems about our campers have learned what Friday > > Haiku means. > > Agreed. > > > Messages still go through here like "Glad to hear that," "I agree," or > > "Thanks for all your help." I feel that if you have this little to say that > > you should send a private message. If I want to thank several people for advice I will do so en masse rather than Individually. Sorry if you think thanking people is trivial.... > I bet a few of them were intended to be. It's entirely too easy to hit "r" > to reply and forget that it is sent to the list. I've even done it a couple > of times, and I do this stuff for a living. > > > Please don't generate traffic just to generate traffic. There are plenty of > > places for that sort of thing in cyberspace. How can you know this is what people are doing? The reason this list is more interesting is that it crosses a greate divide of technical and personal interests. If its technical information only you seek try vintagvw. Can you say dull and repetitive? > > If I might add a little pet peeve of my own, Please also don't quote 80 lines > of text and add 3 new ones at the bottom in your reply!!!! Even with a 56 > row window this gets annoying... I did this once recently, precisely to point out how easily loads of "infomation" can de shot down with one or two simple sentences. > > -David > > ============================================================================= > David Schwarze '73 VW Safare Custom Camper (Da Boat) > SAIC Comsystems, San Diego '73 Capri GT 2800 (Da Beast) > schwarze@nosc.mil '87 Mustang Lx 5.0 (Da Bruiser? Soon...) > ============================================================================= > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- David Carment School of International Affairs Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6 voice - (613) 788-2600-6662 fax - (613) 788-2889 Email address: dcarment@ccs.carleton.ca ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »