

| Subject: | Re: Vanagon-Bug Motor Parts (shared) |
| From: | Dave Kautz |
| Date: | Thu, 1 Dec 94 11:52:52 PST |
> Derek Drew reports: > In the latest issue of Hot VWs a writer enquires about high performance water > cooled motor parts and the editors respond that there isn't much but they > also say this: > > "Fortunately, quite a few of the internal components are interchangeable > between the waterboxer and the Type 1 engine including cam, crankshaft, > distributor, oil pump and rocker arms." > > This sentence sounds like an outrageous assertion--hardly believeable. > > Has anybody else ever even *considered* swapping beetle motor parts into > their 83 and up Vanagon engine???? > > Right. I thought not. > > If you have given this matter any thought or study and you are reading this > post then out with it! Share what you know. > > ---------------------------------------- > > The editors also add that they had an article dealing with modifications to > the "Wasservoxer" engine for performance in the August 85 issue. > > Anybody got this article or know what it says. It might be a good idea to > have it posted to the net. > > derekdrew@aol.com > There are some resemblances between the wasserboxer and the upright fan engine the rocker cover gaskets are the same, for instance, but I believe that the crankshafts are way different. Maybe somebody can look in Bentley to check but I think I remember the wasserboxer crank as being a mixture of type I and IV journal sizes and I think the wasserboxer flywheel goes on with bolts like a Type IV instead of the infamous gland nut. Kautz
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »