

| Subject: | Re: 2 liter vs. 1800 |
| From: | ------ |
| Date: | Thu, 4 May 1995 16:55:47 -0400 (EDT) |
On Thu, 4 May 1995, Dave Kautz wrote:
> I don't agree with your friend. Any money you save would be saved now, not
> later. The fundamental mechanical difference between the 17/1800 and the
> two liter is crankshaft and connecting rods. A rebuilt two liter costs
> a couple hundred more, probably not so much due to content but as to the
> cost of cores and what the market will bear. As Dave Schwarze pointed out,
> many 17/1800 owners seek to upgrade to a 2 liter.
Well, I don't plan to return the core, but I still ordered the 2 liter.
Turned out RMMW was a little cheaper on the GEX than GEX themselves, so
they got my business.
> Enjoy all that extra torque! If they won't take your core, going with the
> 1800 may be worthwhile if you are tight on cash. I think long term savings
> will be zip, since the stuff on the outside of the engine is pretty much
> the same.
Yea, after getting a few more opinions I decided that I can afford it and
it will be worth it now for the extra power.
So, I have a week till the new engine should arrive, and I'm planning all
the other things that seem so convenient to do at this point:
remove gas tank to check sending unit.
(needle goes to F at fillup then to E after ~50 miles)
fix a little rust and clean up engine compartment
I'm sure I'll think of more....
-Gary ClaytonHave something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »