

| Subject: | Re: Speaking of Vanagon Shocks |
| From: | Jonathan Dove - VAX Master |
| Date: | Tue, 9 May 1995 17:01:41 -0400 (EDT) |
>From: ja@decws3.coe.wvu.edu (John Anderson) > Lee, Not to be negative, but how long have you had the P44's, a > friend had a set on his '79 Dodge Challenger, bought them at > SAMS (discount warehouse place) they had a "40,000" mile treadwear > warranty, and he paid a bit more but felt great he was getting > Pirelli's instead of cheapo Generals, at 15,000 miles they were > totaly gone treadwise, might have lasted another couple thousand, > he went back to SAMS and complained they said everyone had these > problems and they were not reccomending them. They gave him a > generous prorating (more than he deserved) he got a set of General > XP2000's and with 10,000 miles they look brand new. I note the > wear on the P44's was even across the tires, on all 4 and not due > to alignment problems, etc. Frankly I am steering clear of Pirelli > in general as a friend had bad luck with P6's on a CRX. On the > subject are the non-reinforced P44's a wise choice anyway, though > since they are S rated probably do have stiffer sidewalls. Plus I I have had good success with the P44s on my rabbit truck. I used a set of 175/70-13 for over 60K miles before taking them off. They still had about 1/4 thread left on them. I took them off only to use a set of Dunlops on alloy wheels. After about 30K miles I wore those down so I got another set of P44s. The old P44s make a good set of rain autocross tires. I was surprised how well they handled. I also got the P44s from Sam's also. The XP2000s are pretty good also. I have a set on my GTI that are 4 1/2 years old and they still look good. They are holding up well even with a year of autocrossing on them. I have heard that the P6s aren't as good as they used to be. Jonathan jdove@gsvms2.cc.gasou.edu
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »