

| Subject: | Re: Some 1600cc questions. |
| From: | Morris H. Arthur |
| Date: | Mon, 15 May 1995 09:53:21 -0400 (EDT) |
Sorry if I'm jumping into the middle of an already discussed topic, but is the "2 liter" a souped up type 1 or a real 2 liter FI pancake ? My real question: I'd be really interested to know if anyone has put a Bug engine into a '76-'79 Bus. Or alternatively, '76-'79 Westfalia camper components on a '68-'71 Bus. I love my 2.0 liter, but It makes me uncomfortable in Mexico/CA. Any experiences ? --------------------------------------------------------- Morris Arthur --> '77 Campmobile Environmental Sciences and Engineering University of North Carolina On Mon, 15 May 1995, M.Grant wrote: > Date: Mon, 15 May 95 08:28:44 CDT > From: M.Grant <mty016@coventry.ac.uk> > To: Multiple recipients of list <vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu> > Subject: Some 1600cc questions. > > > Having pulled the dead 2 litre from my bus a few weeks ago I'm > left with the dilema of rebuilding the 2 litre (which is what > I really want), or slapping in a 1600 (which is all I can really > afford). > > I have a number of partially complete 1600s lying around, and > so would really only require bearings, gasket set and rings to > get a reasonable motor. That lot cost less than the gasket set > alone for the 2 litre. > > I pulled apart an AS21 based engine yesterday and the case, pistons > and bores are in excellent condition, but the whole thing has been > running really rich. The layer of carbon on the pistons and head > is amazingly thick! > > I noticed as well that the oil deflector plate has been installed > the wrong way round, probably not a problem but more a comment on the > care (!?) that the previous builder put the engine together with. > > Which leads to some questions. This engine has a 050 dizzy fitted. > Now Muir says this is a no no for this engine, as it dosn't retard > #3. Has anyone run a 1600 with a 050? Any problems? > > I would have to use the alternator from the 2 litre with the 1600. > I pressume that as the later 1600s had alternators, that they > were of the same type for both engines? > > Having changed the engine mounting arrangement to suit the type 4 > style (i.e.) solid mountings on the chassis, rubber mounting on the > engine, I now find the mounting bar for the 1600 is the other way round > (rubber on the chassis mounts, bolts on the engine). I'm unwilling to hack > the mountings around again, so is there a quick and easy solution to this? > > (The more questions I come up with the more I start to realise I'd > better re-mortgage the cat and go the 2 litre route, but anyway any > answers would be appreciated) > > TIA > cheers > Marcus > '70 bus > __ > Marcus Grant > mty016@uk.ac.cov > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »