

| Subject: | RE: 'Boxer' engine |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Feb 1996 03:18:09 -0400 |
At 12:37 AM 2/2/96 -0600, J. Anton Elmquist wrote: >Boxer? From boxing? Absolutely! <snip> >Since "Boxer" means (in German) either a boxer (the guy who punches people) or >a horizontally opposed engine, I think the derivation is right on. My .02. <snip> >From: vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu on behalf of Maher, Steve (SD-MS) >Sent: February 01, 1996 10:57 AM >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: Re: 'Boxer' engine > > >>>The origin of the term is unclear. >> >>I thought it was because the pistons' movements are reminiscent of the >>fists of two boxers pounding each other. <?> > Hogwash, 'Boxer' refers to the cantankerous nature of these engines and the fact that their intrinsic behaviour can be revolting at times. I respectfully submit that these engines were named after the famous 'Boxer Rebellion' in China, a much larger scale punch-up than a couple of brawling German sluggo's. Tim Smith PS: it's been Friday for 3 hours over on this side of the planet, now where did my brain go? ;>
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »