

| Subject: | Tire Circumference (was: Engine RPM (Re: Squeaky brakes)) |
| From: | Michael A. Radtke |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Feb 1996 08:08:58 -0700 |
Aaron says: "I suggest getting the diameter of the rear wheels by
measuring the radius perpindicularly from the ground up
to to centre of the wheel, as this takes into account
the 'squash' of the tyre (and resultant decreased wheel
diameter) caused by the weight of the van."
I believe it's the circumference that is important. Assuming that the tire
is steel belted, it think that the circumference will be quite stable at
any speed or any amount of squash. Too help understand why squash makes no
difference in circumference, visualize a flexible hula hoop. Think of a
mark on it and how far it rolls in one revolution. Now visualize the same
hoop squashed down to look more like a Caterpillar tractor track. I think
that you can see that one revolution will still go the same distance.
Indeed, if you were to cut the hoop and unroll it out flat, its length, or
what used to be the circumference, would be exactly the distance covered
when it was rolled one revolution.
So, having said all that, it would be best to measure the diameter of the
tire horizontally to calculate the circumference. For best accuracy,
perhaps it would be best to jack the tire off the ground and measure the
circumference directly. Or, how about marking the tire and measuring the
distance to roll the bus one revolution of the tire?
Thanks for listening,
MikeHave something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »