RGOLEN@umassd.edu writes:
> 
> The 115 speed can be explained by a couple of things...tail 
> wind...speedometer error....driving down hill (look at a map...
> England is higher on a map than France is, therefore to go to
> France from England you are driving down), etc.

That would explain it all right...
 
> It does sound feasable considering I've driven the 2.0L version
> at 100....that's all that I said.

If I recall, you said 150km/hr, which is more like 93mph.  That would
mean the claimed top speed of the 2.5 was 22 mph faster than the 2.0.  I
still think it's a stretch.  :-)

-David

============================================================================
David Schwarze                   '73 VW Safare Custom Camper       (Da Boat)
San Diego, California, USA       '73 Capri GT 2800                (Da Beast)
e-mail: des@teleport.com         '87 Mustang Lx 5.0          (13.986@100.81)
http://www.teleport.com/~des     '93 Weber WG-50                  (Da Piano)
============================================================================