

| Subject: | Re: 1.8 gas vs. 2.1 boxer |
| Date: | Sat, 2 Mar 1996 01:46:39 -0500 |
In a message dated 96-03-01 20:37:31 EST, jonww@ix.netcom.com (Jon Walton) writes: > >With all the recent wasserboxer bashing that has been going one, I am >curious about the gasoline 1.8l conversion. For those of you that have >done this conversion, how does the van drive? How would you say the >torque curves compare on the 2.1 vs. the 1.8 inline? It seems the >horsepower ratings are about the same. > >I will probably be opting for a factory rebuild wasserboxer, but I too >am curious as to why VW did not offer a gas 1.8 inline or even the 16v >version. Do these engines not have the lower end torque that a flat >four can offer? > > I do not recall the ratings, but the 1.8 has a longer stroke which helps make more torque. If it was a 2.0 liter, it would be even better.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »