

| Subject: | Re: 81 rebuild - balance or not? |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Apr 1996 20:27:05 -0400 |
In a message dated 96-04-17 03:26:06 EDT, goikem@state.mi.us (Matt Goike) writes: >my motor is being rebuilt w/ heads from mark stephens, new bearings, >and mahle piston/cylinder sets. i asked the mechanic about balancing, he >said it's up to me. he offered the vague question that since all he was >doing (to affect balance) was putting new pistons in, why would i want >to balance things, as he's never had a problem from not doing so. if i'm >not mistaken, things were (or should have been) originally balanced >(maybe?) w/original pistons, rods, crankshaft, flywheel(?), as a set. so >if i'm using different pistons, wouldn't i want to have it balanced again? >am i missing the concept here? is it something i even need to think >about? please excuse my ignorance, illumination appreciated. > >thanks, matthew Stock parts are balanced within certain standards. Factoiy engines have not been balanced as an assembly for years. The crank is balanced, the rods are balnced, the pistons, flywheel, etc, but not as acomplete assembly. If you want max engine life and smoothness, then having the engine balanced is a good idea. Be prepared for the cost however. zCondider though, if you need to replace the clutch plate or flywheel, will you dissasemble the engine to balance it again? If not, then having it balanced now is probavly nt needed or cost effective. Dennis.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »