

| Subject: | Re: Weakly Statz ... |
| From: | David Raistrick |
| Date: | Sun, 26 May 1996 01:38:05 -0400 (EDT) |
an opinion...
<blink! looking at "opinion"..looks like an opnion w/ a pi in it..hmm...>
could it be because they <75's> were the first <?officially?> year w/ FI,
and people were just not sure what to make of it?
justa thought..
!.........................
The not so Keen one
xi8940@freenet.fsu.edu .........................!
\\ // http://www.armory.com/~y21cvb
^\\ \XX/ //^ '68 Beetle !No VW Links, YET!
\\//\\// '74 Super
\/ \/ '75 Rusty Westy-Canadian Model
y21cvb@armory.com xi8940@freenet.fsu.edu lorn@armory.com jg8bt@cyberspace.org
chantry-raistrick@csra.net 76004.3235@compuserve.com
On Fri, 24 May 1996, Mike White wrote:
> > 73 Bus 22
> > 74 Bus 17
> > 75 Bus 5
> > 76 Bus 12
>
> So the analyitical question of the day is:
>
> Why is there such a disproportionately low number of busses in 1975?
> Was everyone spending all their money on roller-skates and bell-
> bottoms?
>
> Hmmm. That's too much thinking for Friday!
>
>
>
> - Mike White
>
> [Mail: mike.white@law.utah.edu - mwhite@eng.utah.edu]
> Visit my '57 23-Window VW BUS at: [http://cloud8.law.utah.edu/]
>
>
>
>Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »