

| Subject: | RE: Why is "reply to" the poster, not list? |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Jun 1996 11:19:29 -0700 |
At 12:28, on 6/5/96, in "RE: Why is "reply to" the poster, not list?",
William A. Killian wrote:
> An advantage to reading on UNIX with Pine. I hit 'R' reply and 'Y' or
> 'N' depending upon whether to also send to the list. And the VW van
> content is... is.... dang sometimes this is hard....
>
> > Ha... my mail program (MS Mail) does just the opposite. It always names
> > the list as the sender, so replies go directly to the list with no
> > intervention on my part... and I wish it named the individual poster
> > instead! I guess the grass is always greener...
With Eudora (Macintosh, at least), there are several options available in
the "Re: Replying" section of the "Settings..." selection of the "Special"
menubar pulldown.
IMHO, "reply to" SHOULD be to the poster and one's mail program should be
set so as to require an extra step to reply to the list, so as to keep
traffic on the list from mushrooming even more.
--
"My! People come and go so quickly here!"
-- Judy Garland as Dorthy Gale in the film "The Wizard of Oz"Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »