

| Subject: | Re: basic electronics question |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Jul 1996 16:30:25 -0700 |
Well it all basically works out, I guess -- I rounded lots of places, did this in my head and came up with 240 ohms, somebody else said 280, another one was 259. I certainly agree that a 1-watt resistor is justified, this guy will run warm! I'll agree that it would be safer to use a 300 ohm resistor, too. It's just that these things aren't all that critical in my experience. The LED's that say they'll take 50ma typically have quite a safety net built into them. The resistors are typically 10%, so the 300 ohm guy really is "somewhere between 270 and 330". One watt dudes are often 20% (which used to be the "standard grade", 10% was "silcer grade", 5% was "gold" -- 1% ones were used in instruments). A 20% one is 240 to 360 range. As to running these in series, the current passing in LEDs is quite non- linear. I don't know if 7 will even light. The caution about the glitch in the regulator is a good one, though. Why did you use the 2.5 in the "5 x 2.5 = 12.5 < 14" bit? later you use the 2.6 (which yields 13 and is closer!). 5 LEDs in series works for me -- I have yet to have one of these arrays fried (I always expect it, though) and figure that this is like a light bulb, allowing for it to burn out someday... A single LED in circuit with the resistor is pretty linear, since the resistor is the major consumer, and as you start adding serial LEDs your risk goes up, but so does your light, and the resistor can be made smaller (in power capability and size). You might try six in series, see if they light adequately (6 x 2.6 is 15.6 -- you'll fry more than LEDs with car voltages like this). Or just use a big 300 ohm resistor. Or 280. Or whatever -- it really isn't all that critical. It will get hot. malcolm
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »