---------------------------------------------------------------------

              ***************************************
              **       This is a warning only      **
              **    No action is required by you   **
              ***************************************

Re: Message to felix@mail.sisna.com

Your message  has not  been  delivered  after  1 hours.   Attempts to
deliver your message will continue for a further  2 hours.  If it has
still not been delivered,  it will be returned to you.  The first few
lines of your message are repeated below.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Your message follows:

>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ya917746; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 16:19:58 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ka916302; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 15:46:10 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ba914239; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 15:08:25 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ba909377; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 14:19:42 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id pa907883; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 13:56:51 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id da904075; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 13:11:59 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id sa902062; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 12:48:00 -0600
>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ja899037; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 12:22:25 -0600
>Received: from [128.101.131.51] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id la894437; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 11:47:13 -0600
>Return-Path: <vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu>
>Received: from halfdan.med.umn.edu by mhub1.tc.umn.edu; Tue, 9 Jul 96 12:38:09 -0500
>Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 12:38:05 -0500
>Received: from  (localhost) by halfdan; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 12:38:05 -0500
>Message-Id: <3190F180.475A@4dmg.net>
>Errors-To: gsker@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Reply-To: jwakefield@4dmg.net
>Originator: vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Sender: vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Precedence: none
>From: jwakefield@4dmg.net (john wakefield)
>To: Multiple recipients of list <vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu>
>Subject: Re: Fuel gauge sender question ('66)
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I)
>X-Info: SISNA
>
>A while back, Erik asked about fuel sender units:
>  "Is there any way of testing it before I reinstall the whole tank?"
> 
>  I expect the normal electrical continuity through movement range test 
>was related to ALL, but a nice trick that should be used when it applies 
>to high milage vehicle designs, is to flip the wire wound resistance 
>sensor coil over before the mobil contact paw abrades all the way through 
>any of the wire wraps. This generic approach applies to hundreds of 
>vehicle designs and doubles their effective life.  On some, just bending 
>the contact paw so that it rubs the coil in a different arc will do.  The 
>idea's the same: Don't let it wear all the way through any single wire 
>wrap, and it will keep on serving you well.
>  Hope this helps someone.
>
>  John Wakefield
>
>
>.