Skip to main content
Gerry | Vanagon
Checking account...
← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
Subject:Warning - delayed mail
From:NTMail
Date:Tue, 9 Jul 1996 18:05:10 -0600

---------------------------------------------------------------------

              ***************************************
              **       This is a warning only      **
              **    No action is required by you   **
              ***************************************

Re: Message to felix@mail.sisna.com

Your message  has not  been  delivered  after  1 hours.   Attempts to
deliver your message will continue for a further  2 hours.  If it has
still not been delivered,  it will be returned to you.  The first few
lines of your message are repeated below.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Your message follows:

>Received: from [205.138.107.34] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id ya919358; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 16:52:53 -0600
>Received: from [128.101.131.50] by mail.sisna.com (NTMail 3.01.03) id oa918594; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 16:35:23 -0600
>Return-Path: <vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu>
>Received: from halfdan.med.umn.edu by mhub0.tc.umn.edu; Tue, 9 Jul 96 17:25:28 -0500
>Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 17:25:15 -0500
>Received: from  (localhost) by halfdan; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 17:25:15 -0500
>Message-Id: <199607092211.PAA09698@mail.pacifier.com>
>Errors-To: gsker@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Reply-To: tbf@PACIFIER.COM
>Originator: vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Sender: vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu
>Precedence: none
>From: tbf@PACIFIER.COM (Todd Francis)
>To: Multiple recipients of list <vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu>
>Subject: Broken hydraulic lifter '86 Question
>X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
>X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
>X-Info: SISNA
>
> Hi all:  I had a cylinder head gasket leak, which pressurized the water
>tank.  The engine had 20,000 miles on it since it had new heads.  I've torn
>the engine down and didn't find any serious looking problems.  Now, while
>putting it back together, I noticed a keeper is missing out of one of the
>hydraulic lifters, and a chip is missing out of the top of the lifter body.
>
>        My question is:  Since the keeper was gone, would it be possible
>that this is what caused the head gasket failure?  My thinking is that
>because the keeper was missing it allowed the lifter to pump up way too far
>and pushed on the valve far enough to cause the spring to bind; thereby
>pushing out on the head, causing the gasket to leak.  There was no piston
>damage from the valve hitting. 
>
>        What do you think?
>
>Todd Francis             tbf@pacifier.com
>'86 Westy Syncro         Vancouver, Wa
>
>.