

| Subject: | Re: Does air cond.=hp loss? |
| From: | ERIC ZENO |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Sep 1996 14:13:39 -0400 (EDT) |
On Thu, 12 Sep 1996, Turner,Ronald L. wrote:
> The last few wasserboxer vans that I've looked at, that had A/C, have had their
> compressor belts removed, and the owners all said the same thing - "It robs too
> much power off the engine." Do the A/C systems in the wasserboxers really suck
> this much? I'd never buy an air cooled van with A/C, but I thought the H2O vans
> could take it. Does it really put that much of a load on the engine? How long
> does it take to get reasonably cool inside once you turn it on? How many of you
> out there have removed your compressor belts too ? My '84 has the big factory
> sunroof but no A/C. The '87 I just bought had the A/C compressor belt removed. I
> wonder if I should just keep my '84 with it's "natural" air cond (sunrf) as I
> won't have to worry about a compressor dogging the engine. Or is the top hp of a
> 1.9 without A/C the same as a 2.1 with the A/C on full blast??
>
> A/C would be nice, but I really don't want to kill the engine, and have the
> accelerating power of my '67 bus! (ie.- reeaal slooowww...)
>
> chris
AC is the biggest load on an engine I know of. Some cars
have a switch on the accelerator that will shut off the
AC compressor when your foot is on the floor. I have a manual
switch on mine. If I am going down hills I switch the AC On.
Up hills I switch it off.
EricHave something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »