

| Subject: | Re: Dennis' opinion of emmision mods/Ed"s Soapboxing(long) |
| Date: | Tue, 17 Sep 1996 14:09:33 -0400 |
Oh Dennis, dont worry, I'm not offened.In fact I appreciate intelligent input and an adversarial point of view(should have been a lawyer right.....NOT!)Calif had the VOC tightening laws about 10 years ago...couldn't even buy lacquer for cars or cabinets.I am in total agreement with the environmentalists, there is far too much pollution, I just feel the gov. has become way too much of a police force in regulating, sometimes the small things that dont contribute grossly, and letting some high powered, read that BIG MONEY, corporations slip by.I mean, what does it matter if, when your 1991 vanagon engine blows, if you install a 1984 long block.In Calif. this is not permitted.That is stupid.Calif,in particular, does an immense amount of overregulating needlessly, just for the sake of regulating.They have the BIG BROTHER complex down pat.It is a shame.(God Dennis, stop me from soapboxing). Anyway, you are right about testing under load.That is why the new EPA standards call for testing on a dyno, so they can somewhat simulate real world active road load conditions and ability to test NOX which they cant test reliably w/o dyno.It is possible that the CO will rise under heavy load due to the vaccum in the press. reg. I suppose it would be interesting to see how much it rises.You can check w/ a meter at standstill, but this wouldnt be realistic.Let me know what you think.See Ya. Ed Berroth 84 Westy Wolf 87 Stinkcrow
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »