

| Subject: | Re: Gene Berg and wasserboxer performance |
| From: | ERIC ZENO |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Oct 1996 00:05:43 -0400 (EDT) |
What???????????????????????????????????
I must have over looked something!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Eric Zeno <emz@nauticom.net>
86 Syncronizer
86 GL For Sale (Pgh. PA)
72 240Z 1936 Chrysler
On Mon, 7 Oct 1996, Cetin Seren wrote:
>
> My question is pretty naive, but, even if the increased stroke still
> fit the existing cylinder depth, and did not play havoc with the
> cylinder head due to increased compression ratio, would it not make
> the engine work harder at high rpms?
> Cetin
>
>
> =========================================================================
> So here is a specific question: I'm thinking what I need first is
> torque, not hp, and that could be just a stroker crank. Is this correct?
>Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »