

| Subject: | RE Bentley Thermostat housing torque values |
| From: | Thomas D. Hanlon |
| Date: | Tue, 19 Nov 1996 08:39:14 -0500 |
-- [ From: Thomas D. Hanlon * EMC.Ver #2.3 ] -- Dave writes: I recently replaced the thermostat in my Vanagon (87 Waterboxer), the Bentley manual (Back cover under "Coolant system, section 19) says I should tighten the bolts on the housing to 61 pound/feet, is this correct? It seems excessive when the housing is plastic, does anybody know if 61 pound/feet is correct, or what it should be tightened to? Dave Dave and Other Listees: That 10 Nm value appears to be a typo or erroneous figure appearing more than once on that Quick Data back cover table. Note the preceding and the following values in the column: pump pulley 20= 15; thermo switches 30=22; and then compare the 10=61 value for the thermostat. Using a ratio and proportion approach, it would appear that "about" half of 20nm is 7 1/2 pounds and "about" half of 30nm is 11 pounds and "about" half of 10 nm is somewhere at 5 ( plus or minus)) pounds, in the range of 6.1 pounds which would apply if the decimal were missing. Note that the same 10 nm = 61 pound feet" value appears at the "thermostat housing" "specification" under "Water-cooled Digijet and Digifant" further down the list. To my untrained and inexperienced eye, it would appear to be missing a decimal point. Maybe an engineer or a mathematician amongst us would analyze the figures. Tom Hanlon Austin, TX
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »