

| Subject: | Re: Synchro Westy |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Dec 1996 14:31:44 -0500 |
In a message dated 96-12-05 10:24:24 EST, spwhite@artsci.wustl.edu (Thoreau) writes: > am considering looking for a synchro westy, or a regular one. here is my >question: > >what is the difference in fuel economy between the synchro and an >equivalent 2wd. I have an 87 Syncro and an 88 Auto trans Vanagon. They both get about the same MPG. I think a 2wd manual trans would get about 1-2MPG better. >can a synchro be used for daily transport without too much fear of >ex$pensive breakdowns. Just one data point, but my 87 Syncro has nealy 150,000 miles and NO Syncro related breakdowns. I have had to replace the front CV loint boots once each, but other than that the van's Syncroness hasn't cost me any additional maintenance or repairs. I have done my share of off-roading in my Syncro as well too. I've heard of several other Syncro owners that have had to have transmissions and/or driveshafts reapired/replaced though. I think I've only heard of 1 replacement of the front diff/viscous coupling. By the way, If you do any computer classifieds searches for Syncros you'll likely get better results spelling Syncro the way VW does without the 'h'. Let us know if you have more questions or buy a Vanagon. Good luck, Jim Davis
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »