

| Subject: | Re: Is a cooler thermostat better for the heads? |
| Date: | Sun, 26 Jan 1997 16:51:26 +0000 |
> I was thinking of replacing the thermostat but I thought of two advantages > with a cooler thermostat: > > 1. The heads would be at a lower temperature. > 2. The thermostat opens up and lets 'heat' (albeit lukewarm) to the > passengers straightaway. > > Does this make sense? > Are there any disadvantages? > Yes. Slow warmup means more engine wear. Oil is meant to be over 180f to aid in burning off combustion by-products, and is designed to lubricate best at this temp range. If I'm not mistaken, most cars, including the Vanagon have the heater loop separate from the thermostat, so coolant runs through the heater core(s) ALWAYS. Just took ours out today in -5C temps, I had heat from the heaters in about 5 minutes, although the gauge had still barely moved.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »