

| Subject: | FW: lowest mileage |
| From: | Morrell, Edward |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 1997 09:41:26 -0700 |
All this debate- It's funny. I feel good about the 107K on my 90 Carat, seeing as I bought 2 years ago with only 52K on it- driven Chicago to Maine, Colorado, Florida twice, and even to work a few times. But, I still feel good about my '75 911S with 25K on it. I think the key on the Vanagon side is to own a driver, and then a Syncro in the stable with almost no miles just in case... One can only dream... Ed 90 Carat 107K >---------- >From: Ron Lussier[SMTP:coyote@zuni.chaco.com] >Sent: Thursday, February 20, 1997 10:24 AM >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: Re: lowest mileage > >At 08:08 AM 2/20/97 -0600, Karen Winter wrote: >>Gregory, >>Well said I was thinking the same thing. >>Vws are intended to be driven and admired, not stored away out of sight. >>Drive them hard, but with care and enjoy them. > >Yeah, that's essentially how I feel. I'm planning on taking my beautiful, >low-mileage westie to South America and back. (And the restoring it :-) > >Coyote >-- >Ron 'Coyote' Lussier /\_/\ ____ Chaco Communications >(408) 865-0657 ( ) \ _/__ 10164 Parkwood Drive #8 >coyote@chaco.com \ / \X / Cupertino, CA 95014-1533 >(1990 VW Westfalia Camper) \_/ \/ http://www.chaco.com/~coyote > >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »