

| Subject: | Re: transmission whoes, scared buyer no mo! |
| Date: | Thu, 1 May 1997 11:54:17 -0400 |
>Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 11:53:09 -0400 >To:Joel Walker <JWALKER@UA1VM.UA.EDU> >From:kelphoto@bright.net (mark keller) >Subject:Re: transmission whoes, scared buyer no mo! > > Thank you for inputting your convictions about vanagons. I have >long held a frustration for the apparent contradiction between what I >beheld as a truly world class vehicle, "truck of the year" in 1980, and >have seen em in news, and movie footage the world over vs. the sour and >dour reputation by the uninformed. At first glance a vanagon is all charm >to me. I feel as a newcomer to the scene, I have been actively searching >and learning for several years, with a desire to get a good one, that the >cooling system's, lets say "uniqueness", coupled with the number of >obstacles in the wasserboxer and for the usual hatred most owners have >with "dealerships" I grew up in a family with a bodyman dad and a stepdad >mechanic, and know my share of dealer stories, which create this negative >reputation. > > Number one question I have now is, does a correlation exist >between: volume of coolant, surface area of coolant system, and factors >such as depletion of effectivness in the actual coolant. For example. Do >rubber or metal pipes carry the fluid to and from the motor. Does this >"volume of liquid" 9 gallons I think, offer any disadvantages. Its seems >that to remove air from such a system that has been "evacuated" would take >some time. Lastly the sealing areas. One potential for air to reenter the >system on cooldown, and especially "unique jug, case and head" >arrangement. I don't if the heads have coolant passages in them. > > Anyway, my number 2 prioity, fire extinguisher is #1, is to get my >coolant situation assesed and corrected if possible. I have been reading >yours and others comments in the archives. My motor has 15k on it and is >a VW factory rebuild. Do those rebuilds get "inspected" and replace as >needed or are there a set of new parts. Are these motors as good as the >implecation of "factory rebuild" implies? Stuff like that is of intrest, >if you could point to the right area to research I like it. The vehicle >has been well cared for mechanically and I'm happy about our prospective >future. Thanks again. MK 91 Carat > >>the problem is, with all cars, not so much your choice of MODEL, but the >>choice of the individual car. :( i got burned on a Porsche and a Mercedes >>in years past ... i picked the right model (for me), but jumped on the >>wrong individual car (a piece of shit in both cases). well, i'm older and >>hopefully wiser now, but my point is that experience (or a friend who has >>it) is the only cure. :( >> >>vanagons are NOT pieces of shit, as a model or group. they DO require some >>other-cars-don't-have-to-do-this maintenance. but actually, i know a fellow >>who had a toyota truck, renowned for their reliability, do the same thing >>with the head gaskets ... because he drove too many miles without changing >>his coolant (the truck also had an aluminum head). so it's not just vanagons >>... although that's all you'll hear about on this list. :) >> >>the trick to finding a good one is look, look, learn, look, and look some >>more. if it seems too good to be true, it is. period. i'm looking for >>another one, and all the ones i've looked at have the head gasket leaks. :( >>(which is evident by either drips under the car, or drive it around a while >>and see a big bubble in the leftmost coolant tank). and i don't even trust >>ANY of the dealers! >> >>so if you want a good one, it just takes a lot of time and looking. but the >>same is true of a porsche or mercedes ... well, cept there are probably a >>lot more of them out there. :) good luck! >>joel >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »