

| Subject: | Re: vanagon questions to the folks that know |
| Date: | Sat, 10 May 1997 02:33:09 -0400 (EDT) |
In a message dated 97-05-09 13:21:47 EDT, raven@halcyon.com (Mark McCulley) writes: << >2)Are there shortcomings specific to an 84 that would've contributed to >consumer report's horrible review of the vehicle? Not really although 84 was a split model year and the first year of the water-cooled engine. In 86 they went to a slightly larger engine (2.1l vs 1.9l) with a different fuel injection system and improved routing for the coolant pipes and hoses. >> Actually all 1984s were 1.9L waterboxers. 1983 wat the split year. (At least in the USA anyway) Jim Davis
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »