

| Subject: | Re: Alternate A/C refrigerants? |
| Date: | Mon, 12 May 1997 21:44:13 GMT |
part of what John Gladu (jgladu@bcm.tmc.edu) wrote: >I'm also looking at R406a - http://worldserver.com/ghg/ - (this is a >FANTASTIC site, with pros and cons clearly stated). >I went here mostly because I noticed that it was developed by George Gob[le] >at Purdue (who I respect, based on previous visits to his homepage - >http://ghg.ecn.purdue.edu ) . I never realized that he'd developed a couple >of alternative refrigerants. R406a and its brother R414a both use the >existing system (except for new fittings) and are compatible with the old >mineral oil lubricant. So what's the drawback? They can go right through >some hoses (require nonpermeable hoses), and, according to one of the sites >I visited, the permeable hoses are quite common on foreign vehicles. They >are also not campatible with Buna-N seals in the compressor (they make a >replacement kit that uses Neoprene seals) and we'd have to check with VW >whether the hoses and seals are "good" or "bad" for using these >refrigerants. Otherwise, they claim to have equal or better cooling >characteristics to good ol' Freon (R12). George Goble posts to the newsgroups <rec.autos.tech> and <sci.engr.heat-vent-ac>; search DejaNews (http://www.dejanews.com/forms/dnsetfilter.html) for author ghg@worldserver.com to read what he has recently posted on this subject - the articles are to long for me to quote them here. Also check out these URL's which have bulletin board forums: http://www.aircondition.com http://www.maxcool.com -- b h k
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »