

| Subject: | Re: Octane Question |
| From: | Bill Collins |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Jul 1997 10:59:18 -0400 |
> At the risk of sparking a "me too" exchange, I'll ask a question: > > Is everyone using the octane rating specified for their Wasserboxer? > > (I am, and intend to continue, so please, no well-intended lectures.) > > If not, is the potential for detonation a factor in head problems that > some are experiencing? > > Okay, that's two questions. Copious apologies in advance if this has > been beat to death already. > > -Blaine > I use Regular (usually 87 octane on the US octane scale) I have never heard a single ping from the engine, even in the mountains where regular is 85 octane or less. This is on a 1.9, the 2.1 has higher compression and is probably different. I have always figured that you should advance the timing until a very small amount of pinging is heard (DON'T Try this on an air cooled engine), but when I tried advancing the timing on my vanagon, the idle speed became unstable. Any ideas? Bill
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »