

| Subject: | Re: General Vanagon List Question |
| From: | Christopher M. Smith |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Nov 1997 12:42:36 -0800 |
On Wed, 26 Nov 1997, Mark Dziak wrote: > I've been on the list off and on for several years and have never seen > this topic discussed and that is: Wouldn't this list work much better > as a newsgroup? Is there a reason why this hasn't been approached and > if it has, what were the results of that venture? This idea was discussed when we were thinking about the transition of the vangon list at u minn to whereever, since Gerry Skerbitz was retiring from list admin. My $0.02 against this proposal were: 1) We'd have absolutely no control over the list once it's started. No I'm not a control freak! But I surely dont want the list to be bombarded with "For Sale" mail and unwanted advertising SPAMS ... something we'd have no control over. 2) VW enhusiasts who wanted access to the list must have access to Usenet. In other words their ISP's must be subscribers to Usenet AND all end-users would need news readers. I know many have the service and readers as part of their net connections, but not all. And it is my concern for the "little guy" that makes me shy away from news group listing. 3) SPAMMERS can obtain many personal email addresses from a single Usenet feed. With the listserv they could eventually do the same, but it would take time and effort ... neither of which most SPAMMERS have. 4) From an administrators stand-point (that is the person who must maintain the list server and LISTSERV/SMTP software), a Usenet group is MUCH simpler (no work, time or effort on my part!). But I'm a subscriber too, and in the long-run it probably takes less effort and time to maintain our service than it would for me to have to scan through all the "junk" mail. Multiply this some 700 times (number of subscribers) and we are looking at saving a LOT of PEOPLE a LOT of TIME. Chris Smith For the VANAGON List Admin Team (Past & Present)
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »