

| Subject: | Re: AT *vs* manual |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Dec 1997 21:08:07 -0500 |
In a message dated 97-12-03 20:00:34 EST, cdes@WELCHLINK.WELCH.JHU.EDU writes: << manuals RULE, my uncle has an 85 gl auto with a conpletely new tranny, but the darned thing won't accelerate worth a lick. >> People - I was talking about reliability here - not performance... there is NO DOUBT that the Automatics hold up better, and last longer than the Manual transmissions... IF I WANT A LOW 0-60 TIME, I WILL BUY A FORMULA ONE RACER... Vanagons are big metal un-aerodynamic lousy coefficient wind drag boxes on wheels.... not race cars... but then again, how much krap/camping gear, etc. can you fit into a Formula One Racer??? ;<) chris
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »