

| Subject: | Re: AT *vs* manual -Reply |
| From: | Eric Small |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Dec 1997 10:08:15 -0600 |
Chris wrote: >People - I was talking about reliability here - not performance... >there is NO DOUBT that the Automatics hold up better, and last longer than >the Manual transmissions... Yesterday, after my note ranting of my '86 GL performance I ran across a beautiful 91 Carat stick van with 65K miles on the clock. Now I want to talk reliability! Is this true that the auto is more reliable and cheaper to maintain than the stick? Should I run from a van with a trailer hitch on its tail? I'm considering buying this van and selling my wife's showroom condition 93 Audi 100 (Tornado red, 26K miles). I'll then have an 86GL and a 91 Carat... Sounds cool but maybe stupid? Advice please! Eric Small Dallas, TX
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »