

| Subject: | Re: different exhaust Q? studs or bolts? |
| From: | Fred Younger |
| Date: | Tue, 3 Mar 1998 09:57:18 -0600 |
I've replaced the exhaust pipes on my 85 GL more times than I've wanted to. I don't blame anyone for putting bolts in instead of studs. The studs often come out, they get chewed up and unusable, they're harder to find in the right size, and they're a pain to put in. They are handy for holding the pipes in place while you're tightening them down. Is there any other downside to bolts? --------------- Fred Younger f1y@csm1.doit.wisc.edu > > >This exhaust thread got me thinking. My relatively new to me 83.5 Westy had > a > >rebuilt water cooled engine that was "installed" by a DPOs "mechanic." > > > >On my bus the exhaust is bolted to the heads with bolts. It would seem to > me > >that the heads would correctly have studs with nuts holding the exhaust in > > > On 2.1's both are used, studs on one side of the head (and engine as it ends > up, looking from front or back) bolts on the other. Studs by the flat > coolant flange not the big nipple. > > Funny thing on the '85 I think it is mostly bolts, but previous idiot > mechanic may have done that. look at Bently > > John > vwbus@mindspring.com >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »