

| Subject: | (Is British Engineer an oxymoron?) |
| From: | Judith Barr / Leo Girard |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Mar 1998 11:04:28 -0500 |
Eventually & obliquely van related but the main message might contain a liitle humorous (?) perspective that we all need at times...Friday might have been a better day for it. [ ;+|] A comment that stuck with me made about an '54 MG-TF I used to have . These were among the last Brits with wooden members in the undercarriage (among other throwback technologies). A friend wryly said that it was common for "British Engineers to come up with something TEN years ahead of its time then use it for TWENTY-FIVE years." [Well the 63 Jag does still look good!] The extended starter motor axle mentioned recently on the list is an example of Brit straightforward practicality. British engineers and Brits in general seem to have a very practical mentality. A house in England I stayed in had the bare water supply pipes running OUTSIDE the house. Naturally when the weather turned (infrequently fortunately) cold they had a problem with freezing water pipes. "That's why they're on the outside, 'mate', easier to get to in case of freezing". Some of aero-engineer subscribers will probably tell you that the Spitfire was a bit more than ten years ahead of its time and should prove that there REALLY ARE British engineers. In the nick of time. Although the simplicity of English cars I owned (Austin A, MG-TF,Vauxhalls x 2) taught me my first lessons in car repair, there was always something weirdly and erratically ingenious on every vehicle. DOES THIS LAST PART REMIND YOU OF A QUIRKY VAN SOME OF US DRIVE? Makes me wonder during those occasional dark Vanagon clouds we all pass under from time to time, whether "German Engineering" is as good as its reputation and perhaps oxymoronic in itself.
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »