

| Subject: | Re: One-ton vans |
| From: | Malcolm Holser |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Mar 1998 20:55:33 -0800 |
> Wasn't there a post a couple of years ago from a guy who transported a > civil war canon half way across the country? I think he might have even > done it in a splitty. Anybody remember? Joel? > Yes, there was -- and I have hauled some heavy things as well -- like *two* tons of ceramic tile -- yards of sand, etc. I was not wanting to start a thread on testimonials, though -- I'll freely grant that you can seriously overload these and still move down the road. I'll even grant that they drive better with about 600kg load in their shorts. > Compared to the Ford ranger pickup I had it is much more capable of > carrying a load. As well it *should* be -- the Ford is rated at 1/2 Ton. Even that rating kind of seems optimistic compared to the Ford F-150 -- also rated at 1/2 Ton. To get to a "one-ton" truck in US terms, you have to go all the way to a Ford F-350 -- a seriously large vehicle. I was merely offering the unasked-for-opinion that the two systems of rating are somehow coming from totally different directions. What brought this to mind was the Austrian power supply in my Sun computer. It, like many PC supplies, is rated at 350 watts. It is seriously overbuilt. The Korean versions probably will put out 350 watts of power -- just like our Vanagons really can haul a ton of material. I suspect that a Ford F-350 could haul *many* tons, despite it being called a "one-ton" truck. In US terms, all one-ton trucks pretty much come with eight-lug wheels (often they are dual-wheels as well) and full-floating axles. Empty, they probably outweigh a Vanagon loaded to full gross. Despite all that, the power suply on my Sun seems to have bit the dust, and I'm certain it costs plenty to replace. All that overbuilding does not come cheap. And 350 watts seems not enough to handle a machine the size of the Sun -- it ain't a PC, either. As to the size-of-things hauled, I doubt that there is a more capable hauler in a small truck than a VW singlecab. The bed is far larger than the 4'x8' typical in a US "full size" truck. The VW is closer to 3mx2m. I'd love one of the new Doublecab transporters with the long wheelbase and syncro -- the Vanagon DC box is both too small and *way* too high for best use. Not that I'd ever trade for a Ford F-350, though. I *love* my VWs. Sigh. Malcolm 1980 Vanagon L Westfalia 1981 Vanagon L (parts) 1982 Vanagon L Westfalia Diesel (parts) 1986 Vanagon GL 1986 Transporter Kombi Syncro 1986 Transporter Doublecab Syncro
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »