

| Subject: | Re: Slick 50 any good? |
| From: | Sam Scholten |
| Date: | Fri, 1 May 1998 08:53:25 -0700 |
---"J.W.Brier" <Jan@HRPS.DEMON.NL> wrote: > > >> In the interests of continuing to keep my '89 syncro in top condition, I > >> thought I might use the oil additive Slick 50. > > > An amazing discovery i'nit? > No. I slick 50'd a Geo at 110K because it had an oil leak and I thought the S50 would be insurance if I was out on the expressway and the oil got a bit low, unbeknownst to me. (it didn't leak at a consistent rate) Well, as further insurance, I was ANAL about how much oil was in the crankcase- just like on a Bus- and threw a rod 8K later anyway. Of course, this incident happened after I asked the list about using Slick 50 in a 1.9, and Unca Joel says, "Save your money." So, save your money. By the way, check out the Type II archive- recently, there was a thread about canola oil. Boxer salad, anyone? :) Sam == "Punk's not dead (it just sucks right now)" | "I'm not Punk, I'm New-Wave!" ...quit whining... http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Backstage/6507 _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »