At 4:25 PM 5/8/98, Steven X. Schwenk wrote:
>The seat belt law more or less achieves voluntary seat-belting and is
>modifing behavior so that people automatically buckle up out of habit
>and common sense, not because of the coercion of the law.  I've never
>seen the law enforced.  If you don't want to wear one, don't.  Because
>the law is generally not abused by the police and because it saves
>millions in insurance premiums (mine too) not to mention lives.... I say
>leave it alone.  Now if you're willing to pay mandatory higherr
>insurance premium to cover the extra costs and risks of  being a
>non-seatbelted driver, then the argument to abolish the laws might be a
>little more persuasive to me.

        In California violation of the seat belt law is a primary offense
        (used to be secondary) giving the police the right to stop you
        to enforce it.

        Anecdotally...I've personally seen tickets given for passenger
        violation of the law...

      OLTECO                         Ari Ollikainen
      P.O. BOX 3688                  Networking Technology and Architecture
      Stanford, CA                   Ari@OLTECO.com
      94309-3688                     415.517.3519