On 10 Jun 98 at 7:39, Sam Scholten wrote:

> Chris,
>
> I agree 200%. I can understand how it is possible to build a
> front-engined car resembling a Type I, but how the f$%# can anybody
> even approximate a "bus" this way? Part of the appeal of the bus was
> the way it felt on the road with the weight in the back, as well as
> having the front wheel under you. When I got my van, people fought to
> ride shotgun home from partying. Back-road cruising is also a blast.
> That doesn't quite happen in a Caravan.
>
> I would suggest contacting Volkswagen AG with your friend's renderings
> and a cover letter explaining the appeal of the T1-T3 Transporters.
> Remember, the only real problem with the newer (88-91) Vanagons were
> that they were overpriced and underpowered. If Mr. Pi�ch really wants
> to sell products in America, I don't understand why they wouldn't
> listen.
>
Overpriced, yes. Underpowered? Only in comparison to the magic wagons which
were then coming with V6s standard. An early 4 banger Caravan had about the
same power as the w/b Vanagons. Personally, I find my '88 Westy has plenty of
power, but then I'm a long time diesel driver who's used to using the available
power effectively.
I love the Vanagon (and earlier) bus designs, but I don't think we can expect
VW to go back to a rear engine bus again. The easiest way for them to offer
more power affordably is to use an existing platform which has a V6 already.

The EV was a flop in the US, so I don't think VW is ready to take another risk
just to satisfy the US market.

========================
Shawn Wright
Computer Systems Manager
Shawnigan Lake School
250-743-6240
swright@sls.bc.ca