

| Subject: | Re: 3-pronged spark plugs |
| From: | David Ohlemacher |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Jun 1998 19:12:50 -0400 |
Not off hand, but I did hear the local import parts guy give the price for both to a customer on the phone $2 each for Bosch and $13 each for the NGK!! Hope they're worth it! Dave 86 Vanagon GL -----Original Message----- From: Justin B. Jensen [SMTP:jjensen@SPRINTMAIL.COM] Sent: Thursday, June 18, 1998 6:58 PM To: Vanagon@VANAGON.COM Subject: Re: 3-pronged spark plugs Anyone have a part number for the NGK equivalent to the Bosch W7DTC? Thanks Justin Jensen SLC Utah -----Original Message----- From: David Katsuki <katsuki@BBN.COM> To: Vanagon@VANAGON.COM <Vanagon@VANAGON.COM> Date: Thursday, June 18, 1998 2:13 PM Subject: Re: 3-pronged spark plugs >I've used W7DTCs for several years in both vans (87 and 90) with no >problems. They seem to last much longer than the single electrode type. > >Dave > >At 11:43 AM 6/17/98 -0400, Mark Schrope wrote: >>I was thinking about putting 3-pronged Bosch plugs in my 89 and so was >>double-checking the part number by emailing Bosch. I read in the archives >>that several of you have had good results with the 3-pronged W7DTC type. I >>asked them about this one specifically and he said that while it was a >>commonly used plug on VW/Audi, it was too long for use on the Vanagon. >>This reminded me of the recent thread where someone was having a problem >>where it seemed the plug was too long. Not sure how that can be given that >>several people have had good results with the plugs. Oh well, just thought >>some of you could use the info. I know this is common knowlege but the >>compatible plugs he listed for an 89 were W7CC, W7CC0 and WR7CP >> >>Mark >>'89 Wolfsburg >> >> >> >>__________________________________________________________________________ _ >___ >> >>Mark Schrope >>Virginia Institute of Marine Science >>PO Box 1346 >>Route 1208, Greate Road >>Gloucester Point, VA 23062 >>(804)684-7220 [office] (804)684-7675 or 7007 [labs] >>(804)684-7250 [fax] >>__________________________________________________________________________ _ >___ >> >
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »