

| Subject: | Re: why swap engines |
| From: | David Marshall |
| Date: | Thu, 30 Jul 1998 23:05:58 -0700 |
Reasons for swapping my engine:
1 - The wasserboxer will have leaking heads, usually under 200,000 km
2 - $2000 Canadian for a decent rebuild of a wb with leaking heads
3 - 2.0L Audi 80 engine installed is about $1500 Canadian (less than a wb
rebuild)
4 - VW / Audi inline four engines are still going strong at 300,000 km and
I had a Deisel with 400,000km - they last forever
5 - If you inline four dies... burry it and get another from one of the
millions of other VWs in the wrecking yard
6 - My conversion uses all factory parts and any VW mechanic can service it.
7 - Inline fours are less poluting, more efficient and with the 2.0L more
power full
At 20:36 7/30/98 -0700, Michael Harrnacker wrote:
>I've been on this list long enough to notice a significant percentage
>of vanagon owners have swapped out their flat-four engines and diesels
>for other engines.
>
>My questions is why? Is the cost of replacing a boxer engine so
>prohibitive that it's cheaper to reinvent all the supporting equipment
>for a different engine? It doesn't seem to me that the engines
>changes are gaining so much more power that it overrides the headaches
>of reengineering the car, plus the headaches of finding parts for such
>a (sorry) mongel.
>
>Mike H.
>89 Weekender
>
>_________________________________________________________
>DO YOU YAHOO!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
-- David Marshall, Quesnel BC, mailto:david@volkswagen.org --
-- 78 1.8L VW Rabbit, 80 2.0L VW Caddy, 87 Audi 5KQ --
-- 85 1.8L VW Cabrio, 88 1.6L VW Syncro Double Cab --
-- Volkswagen Homepage http://www.volkswagen.org --
-- USE DAVID@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG WHEN SENDING PMAIL --Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »