

| Subject: | Re: Have I screwed up this head? |
| From: | Austin |
| Date: | Fri, 31 Jul 1998 22:28:57 -0700 |
At 09:03 PM 7/31/98 -0700, you wrote: > I decided I'd "chase" the threads in > the head with the appropriate tap. > > Turning in the tap took considerably more effort than I would have > expected (the threads in the head *looked* fine) but now the stud > turns in easily by hand. In fact, the stud now "rocks" very slightly > when it's at the correct depth. > >Tom Young young@sherlock.SIMS.Berkeley.EDU This situation has popped up twice now (recently it was ref spark plug threads). Chasing threads with standard cutting style taps is a real losing proposition - losing metal, that is. There is a type of tap generically called a 'roll' tap; it works by force/forming a thread rather than by cutting the parent material. Special considerations apply when making *new* threads with a roll tap, but as a buggered thread chaser it can't be beat; it will start more easily than a cutting tap (using a 'plug' style tip) and when coated with a *dry* film of anti-seize will do as good a job as possible re-forming the metal as opposed to removing it. Won't ever be as good as the original thread, but is far better than what a cutting tap gives you. You won't find them at OSH or Sears, but a true machine shop supply distributer (Shop Tools, Western, Advanced, etc) will know what you want (get an 'H3' class fit - sorta yields a 2B thread); they *are* pricey compared to a Vermont/Sears/etc (junk-mho) tap, but if you salvage that thread w/o having to remove the head....?? Austin (ps - in your situation Tom, it's too late; gotta Heli-Coil it...believe it or not, there are roll taps sized for helical inserts - the *ultimat* answer in aluminum & other soft materials <properly done, cold-flowed threads are much stronger than cut threads>).
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »