

| Subject: | Re: R12 - Freon |
| From: | EMZ |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Aug 1998 06:30:49 -0400 |
Is this the stuff they call FR-12? How did it compare
in temperature?
Eric 86-VW4x4
vw4x4@fyi.net 72-240z
Pittsburgh, PA USA 1936-Chrysler
On Fri, 21 Aug 1998, Frank Terhaar-Yonkers wrote:
> Folks -
>
> I've been running the an R-12 (Autofrost) substitute all summer now and can
> report that it works just fine. It's a bit more expensive that R-134 ($250 for
> a 25lb jug) but *no* conversion is required.
>
> - Frank
>
> >Subject: Re: R12 - Freon
> >To: Vanagon@VANAGON.COM
> >
> >Yes, this is true, but the fact remains that r-12 is being phased out
> >and will someday no longer be avail in The States. Only recycled is now
> >and it requires a special licence to be purchased. It is now very
> >expensive.
> >
> >FHerzig@swri.edu wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry folks, but the patent on Freon ran out long ago, sometime
> >> before 1974. At NASA-Langley we had a wind tunnel that flowed
> >> Freon rather than air and when the patent ran out, the cost to
> >> supply the wind tunnel dropped in half because of competition.
> >> Patents are only for 17 years (generally, some specific situations
> >> can modify it slightly) and Freon has been around a long time.
> >>
> >> Frank Herzig
> >> '85 Vanagon, with AC but took the compressor belt off long ago.
> >
>
>
> \\\\////\\\\////\\\\\////\\\\\////\\\\////\\\\////\\\\////\\\\////\\\\////\\\\
> Frank Terhaar-Yonkers
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> Cat3900 Software Team
> 7025 Kit Creek Road PO Box 14987
> Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
> fty@cisco.com voice (919)472-2101 FAX (919)472-2940
>Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »