

| Subject: | Re: why does #3 pist/cyl always go bad first? |
| From: | Ken Korn |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Aug 1998 20:32:03 -0500 |
On the '82 Westy I purchased last month, the compression on the engine (a GEX with about 60k miles on it) read: #1 105 #2 135 #3 100 #4 140 This seems to fit your pattern. Ken kkorn@jump.net Austin, TX On Tuesday, August 25, 1998 12:29 PM, John Anderson [SMTP:janderson@IOLINC.NET] wrote: > >The type IV engine moved the oil cooler around so it was in front of #4 > >and > this > >should have worked to even out the cooling but then they loaded up the 3-4 > side > >of the engine with stuff like EGR, cat & funny heaters. This did not help > #3 at > >all. The fact that all Fuel Injected type IV engines have asymetrical > (un-equal > >path lengths from exhaust valves to tail pipe) exhaust systems can not > >help > >either. > > > But in actuality it did at least seem to make 1 as suceptible as 3 to > problems. FWIW every higher (125k+) mile T4 I've seen is down about evenly > compression wise on 1 and 3 say 1 and 3 at about 85-95 psi, 2 and 4 around > 110-120, but the wierd thing, most that I have later torn down (admittedly > only about 5 motors) have suffered a receded INTAKE not exhaust and usually > on 1 not 3. Still I agree entirely the T4 and T3 for that matter oil > cooler > relocations don't seem apt to help that much as they feature restricted > cooling to both cylinders on the 3,4 side but do not hit 3 alone. In a > waterboxer, should be no favoritism, unless by the exhaust path lengths. > > John > janderson@iolinc.net
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »