Kelly,
  Don't be so offensive.  I did not against other things you mentioned
except may be the airbag.  I have doubts on any very expensive "safety"
device which has the possibility of KILLING.  It DID kill almost 100 people
in the States so far. The airbag sensor which trigger the explosion is not
reliable too.  Just visit the junk yard and you'll see cars totaled but the
airbag is still intact.
 There are many reasons to against mandatory DRLs.  Not to mention that you
at Canada has much less ambient lighting especially in the winter than the
US.  Just check the web page http://www.lightsout.org/.   My points is if
you want it, just turn the headlight switch on.  Why mandate it?
Regards,
Yi-Ruey Wei
87 Vanagon GL Syncro w/78K miles
85 Jetta GLI w/165K miles
Dallas, Texas

Kelly Bauman <bauman@ICAN.NET> on 09/17/98 12:09:03 PM

Please respond to Kelly Bauman <bauman@ICAN.NET>
To:   Vanagon@VANAGON.COM
cc:
Subject:  Re: If You're Against Mandatory Daytime Running Lights...

At 09:44 17-09-98 -0500, Yi-Ruey Wei wrote:
>Dear list members,
>If you're the one against mandatory DRLs, please send letter to NHTSA
>before it's too late!
Why would you be against DRLs?  Unless of course you are also opposed seat
belts, air bags, turn signals, brake lights, side impact beams, etc.

Kelly Bauman
Delta, BC
'91 Westy

----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.   If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
computer.