

| Subject: | Against it all.Re: If You're Against Mandatory Daytime Running Lights... |
| From: | EMZ |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Sep 1998 18:33:59 -0400 |
Doesn't anyone remember 10 mile-an-hour bumpers, or
cars that would not start unless you had your seat belt
on. This is nothing but crap! Most people have to learn to
drive first.
If they want to do anything constructive they should make
a federal law: You may not do anything except drive in the
driver seat. No phones, makeup, shavers, smoking, eating or
drinking, even heavy conversation. This would stop most traffic
jams, road rage, a lot of accients.
Keep it under 100 M.P.H.
Eric 86-VW4x4
vw4x4@fyi.net 72-240z
Pittsburgh, PA USA 1936-Chrysler
On Thu, 17 Sep 1998, Kelly Bauman wrote:
> At 09:44 17-09-98 -0500, Yi-Ruey Wei wrote:
> >Dear list members,
> >If you're the one against mandatory DRLs, please send letter to NHTSA
> >before it's too late!
>
> Why would you be against DRLs? Unless of course you are also opposed seat
> belts, air bags, turn signals, brake lights, side impact beams, etc.
>
>
>
> Kelly Bauman
> Delta, BC
> '91 Westy
>Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »